Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Steelsilk Sack

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Confoederatio Helvetica
    Posts
    99

    Default Steelsilk Sack

    Is there a chance to lower the requirements for steelsilk sacks to lvl 100?
    its at "any school level minimum 105" so we cant use it


  2. #2

    Default Re: Steelsilk Sack

    I was taking this as a hopeful sign of the Devs planning to raise the level cap

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pacific NW, USA // Order
    Posts
    1,131

    Default Re: Steelsilk Sack

    If Sacks and Satchels (cloth and hide) followed the pattern of handwraps (cloth, padded cloth, hide and leather) the ironsilk sack would be level 80 (and if there were one) the padded ironsilk sack would be level 85.

    Thus if the level on cloth sacks were reduced by 5, we could have a level 100 steelsilk sack, and perhaps a Master formula to allow crafting of these. This change would bring the sack/satchel to having a new one each 10 levels, certainly more logical than the current arrangement of 5 levels then 15 then 5 etc.

    Any chance of this happening??

    Knossos
    Last edited by Knossos; February 9th, 2010 at 06:04 PM.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Steelsilk Sack

    There was a discussion in this thread here addressing this item.

    Velea, in post #19 of that thread responded as follows:
    Quote Originally Posted by Velea
    The Steelsilk Sacks were added to a loot table for treasure chests along with T6 pouches.

    It would be correct to say that the stats on the Steelsilk Sack were not properly updated when they were added to the treasure table. That will be fixed, of course.

    We have, however, left them on the table as an occasional "surprise, you got a treasure" item from the new tables that chests pull from.
    The line mentioning that the stats were not properly updated and would be fixed lead some players, myself included to infer that this meant that the equip requirements would be lowered. However, looking back, it does not specifically say this.

    I believe I read a post by Amon since this post that lead me to believe that the requirement is 105 and won't be changing. Again, that's what I took from his reply and I could have gotten the incorrect message.
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster
    I'm gonna post in this one too!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •