Quote Originally Posted by Exrage View Post
I'd ask where is that lore, other than game mechanics as there's nothing stating that primal magic isn't capable of performing similar functions when altered by a dragon.
Mechanics have an influence on lore and thus they can not be completely disregarded (PVP can be argued, though, as it's not officially supported). If you ignore mechanics, you must also ignore everything that comes through mechanics. Which is essentially everything that only exists within the game such as quest lines. The Khutit form, for example, must be disregarded as I don't think there's any official out-of-game context written for it.

If you choose to be selective of which game mechanics you allow for lore (such as Khutit form), and which game mechanics you ignore (such as mechanics that dictate what Dragons can do with their magic), then you're making exceptions in order to make Dragons seem the superior race. One can make anything seem superior to anything else if they make enough exceptions, so it's not really an accurate argument to make.

As far as both written out-of-game lore and officially supported game mechanics go, Dragons were vastly superior to bipeds, but that hasn't been the case for quite some time. It was the work of a couple bipeds that caused the loss of the Sleeper (the first Dragon to come after Drulkar). Bipeds are a force to be reckoned with, both in lore and mechanics.